Hb_091378_010

Information

Type -
Description -
Location Contig91378: 67-573
Sequence    

Annotation

kegg
ID pda:103700431
description uncharacterized LOC103700431
nr
ID WP_042918419.1
description MULTISPECIES: hypothetical protein, partial [Pseudomonas fluorescens group]
swissprot
ID -
description -
trembl
ID W9QCU7
description Uncharacterized protein OS=Morus notabilis GN=L484_006131 PE=4 SV=1
Gene Ontology
ID -
description -

Full-length cDNA clone information

cDNA+EST
(Sanger&Illumina)
(ID:Location)		 -
cDNA
(Sanger)
(ID:Location)		 -

Similar expressed genes (Top20)


Rank Gene Score (JSD) Function Description NCBI(nr) information
1 Hb_091378_010 0.0 - - MULTISPECIES: hypothetical protein, partial [Pseudomonas fluorescens group]
2 Hb_159229_030 0.0006580106 - - hypothetical protein CISIN_1g0034891mg, partial [Citrus sinensis]
3 Hb_002457_010 0.0012754101 - - polyprotein [Oryza australiensis]
4 Hb_160190_010 0.0024086575 - - Flavonol synthase/flavanone 3-hydroxylase, putative [Ricinus communis]
5 Hb_009423_020 0.0209706416 - - serine-threonine protein kinase, plant-type, putative [Ricinus communis]
6 Hb_006351_100 0.0274202584 - - hypothetical protein POPTR_0011s01952g [Populus trichocarpa]
7 Hb_001335_020 0.0298472865 - - hypothetical protein CICLE_v10033628mg, partial [Citrus clementina]
8 Hb_010098_030 0.0343604035 - - conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus communis]
9 Hb_008493_010 0.0354009657 - - hypothetical protein JCGZ_10529 [Jatropha curcas]
10 Hb_000307_020 0.0371866468 - - PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC100255757 [Vitis vinifera]
11 Hb_001695_050 0.0424737005 - - PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC104884077 [Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris]
12 Hb_000917_040 0.0442247202 - - PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC105639996 [Jatropha curcas]
13 Hb_043346_010 0.0453962632 - - PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC105761922 [Gossypium raimondii]
14 Hb_002857_010 0.0476070475 - - leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase [Populus trichocarpa]
15 Hb_002527_020 0.0491246638 - - PREDICTED: F-box protein At1g30790-like [Jatropha curcas]
16 Hb_005162_050 0.0531492749 - - hypothetical protein B456_009G352100 [Gossypium raimondii]
17 Hb_078038_010 0.0618997194 - - hypothetical protein CISIN_1g038197mg [Citrus sinensis]
18 Hb_000062_040 0.0631089686 - - PREDICTED: uncharacterized protein LOC105766209 [Gossypium raimondii]
19 Hb_003623_060 0.064020497 - - conserved hypothetical protein [Ricinus communis]
20 Hb_002105_060 0.0703373147 - - hypothetical protein POPTR_0022s00320g [Populus trichocarpa]

Gene co-expression network

sample Hb_091378_010 Hb_091378_010 Hb_159229_030 Hb_159229_030 Hb_091378_010--Hb_159229_030 Hb_002457_010 Hb_002457_010 Hb_091378_010--Hb_002457_010 Hb_160190_010 Hb_160190_010 Hb_091378_010--Hb_160190_010 Hb_009423_020 Hb_009423_020 Hb_091378_010--Hb_009423_020 Hb_006351_100 Hb_006351_100 Hb_091378_010--Hb_006351_100 Hb_001335_020 Hb_001335_020 Hb_091378_010--Hb_001335_020 Hb_159229_030--Hb_002457_010 Hb_159229_030--Hb_160190_010 Hb_159229_030--Hb_009423_020 Hb_159229_030--Hb_006351_100 Hb_159229_030--Hb_001335_020 Hb_002457_010--Hb_160190_010 Hb_002457_010--Hb_009423_020 Hb_002457_010--Hb_006351_100 Hb_002457_010--Hb_001335_020 Hb_160190_010--Hb_009423_020 Hb_160190_010--Hb_006351_100 Hb_160190_010--Hb_001335_020 Hb_009423_020--Hb_006351_100 Hb_009423_020--Hb_001335_020 Hb_010098_030 Hb_010098_030 Hb_009423_020--Hb_010098_030 Hb_000307_020 Hb_000307_020 Hb_009423_020--Hb_000307_020 Hb_006351_100--Hb_001335_020 Hb_006351_100--Hb_010098_030 Hb_006351_100--Hb_000307_020 Hb_000917_040 Hb_000917_040 Hb_006351_100--Hb_000917_040 Hb_001335_020--Hb_010098_030 Hb_001335_020--Hb_000307_020 Hb_001335_020--Hb_000917_040 Hb_005162_050 Hb_005162_050 Hb_001335_020--Hb_005162_050
Green: transcription factors, Orange: rubber biosynthesis, Blue: desease resistance

Expression pattern by RNA-Seq analysis

RRIM600_Latex RRIM600_Bark RRIM600_Leaf RRIM600_Petiole PB350_Latex RRIM901_Latex
0 0 0 0.156607 0 0
RRII105_Latex_C RRII105_Latex_S RRIM928_Latex RRIM928_Bark RRIM928_Leaf
0 0 0 0 0.216782

CAGE analysis